Well it is the beginning of Month 4 of my journey to integration.
I found a great website already. http://edtech2.boisestate.edu/mattarnetoj/502/conceptmap.html I'll have to check it out more, but it looks interesting at a quick glance.
Do you think that a charter school with only games (i.e. hands on equipment, video games, board games, etc) as the curriculum would be a viable opportunity for students? What would be some of the drawbacks to this type of system? Would this type of school be able to produce well-educated students?
What does it mean to be well-educated? Is there some room in that definition for creativity? Is it possible to have a well-educate student who can not pass a standardized test? Likewise, it is possible to have a proficient student who is not well-educated?
Do games have a legitimate place in education? Do games help with student understanding and learning? Are these latter two things mutually exclusive? Or are they symbiotic?
Mutually exclusive like each lense on a pair of eyeglasses. |
Hmmm I really want to get on that soap box next, but ya'll will have to wait for another session of "Thoughts".
The conundrum of the day.
Images were created in Microsoft Word using Shapes and related formating.
ReplyDelete